5/31/2008

Education to Protect Humanity

Science 30 May 2008:
Vol. 320. no. 5880, p. 1133
DOI: 10.1126/science.1160201


Editorial

by David Hamburg

Figure 1
After millennia of mass exterminations, genocides such as those in Rwanda, Bosnia, and Darfur continue to plague the world. Given today's ready access to lethal weapons and technology-assisted incitements to hatred, the plague is poised to spread. How can we reverse this potential for malignant growth?

For decades, biological and behavioral sciences have explored factors in human conflict. But explicit focus on the prevention of mass violence, especially genocide, has lagged behind until recently. A finding of practical significance is that genocide-prone behavior can be foreseen years in advance, and this period of time could be used for prevention by applying pertinent knowledge and skills, mostly of recent origin.

Figure 2
CREDIT: GETTY IMAGES
Studies by international collaborators, mainly social scientists and policy analysts in universities, the United Nations, and several commissions, clarify what various organizations and institutions can do to build "pillars of prevention" that can greatly reduce the risk of genocide and other mass violence. These pillars include preventive diplomacy (such as efforts by former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan to resolve conflict in Kenya) and long-term measures, especially democratic governance, equitable socioeconomic development, and constraints on weaponry.*

The pillar of education is vital in this context. Educating societies about hatred and violence is an old story in human history. But there is a better way. For example, decades of research on intergroup contact show how age-appropriate education can help people to live together harmoniously, even across previously adversarial barriers. Such intergroup contact is most effective when imbedded in shared, mutually rewarding activities that are supported by relevant authorities with a mutual aid ethic and seen as a source of benefits for all--so-called superordinate goals. Such goals may enhance intergroup relations within a school or community but also help substantially in preventing mass violence. There is no more vivid example than the recognition by the United States and the Soviet Union that avoiding nuclear war was a superordinate goal that could only be achieved by cooperation. Could global problems of food, water, health, and climate be made superordinate goals for unfriendly groups or states to tackle cooperatively?

Just as lifelong learning in mathematics, science, and technology is essential for the success of a modern economy, so too the teaching of pro-social behavior across the life-span can help to prevent immense destruction. This involves explicit information and hands-on experience with conflict resolution, violence prevention, mutual accommodation between groups, and conditions conducive to peaceful living. Evaluations of programs that emphasize pro-social behavior have identified methods that effectively teach children in these areas. Both science education and peace education require periodic updating and reinforcement on a long-term basis, and curriculum reforms cannot afford to neglect the latter as a vital component of modern education.

Schools, universities, academies, and international organizations can work together to develop and disseminate curricular material to overcome ethnocentrism, prejudice, and predisposition to violent pseudo-solutions. Good examples of such collaboration are the InterAcademy Panel and InterAcademy Council. These multinational organizations of science academies were created to mobilize the scientific community on a worldwide basis to address global needs and opportunities by advising national governments and international bodies, including the United Nations and the World Bank. It is vital to understand throughout the world the nature of human diversity and the fact of our common humanity.

These efforts are highly interdisciplinary and international, linking research with policy. They require international centers of knowledge and skill in prevention to identify warning signals and prepare appropriate responses well before a genocide begins. Such centers are now getting under way in the United Nations and the European Union, and they must be maintained.

5/29/2008

智力与智慧

人究竟是越老越糊涂还是越老越聪明?这是一个永远辩不清的问题。辩不清的原因在于,对“聪明”的理解大不相同。

一般来说,年长的人总是不如年轻人学习能力强,婴幼儿学东西是最快的,这是生存的需要,进化的必然结果。相应地,老人的记忆力也大大地逊色,拿东忘西是家常便饭,所以有“老糊涂”一说。但是老人也有老人的强项,一个复杂的问题,年轻人可能感到千头万绪无从下手,老人却往往举重若轻一语中的,所以政治家往往都是老头子,这不仅仅是一个资历问题。

Harvard的Shelley Carson的实验恰好说明了这一问题:

Memory Older Brain Really May Be a Wiser Brain


就像这种图上显示的信息一样,年轻人更擅长专注于一件事情,而老人更习惯兼顾全局。所以用同一标准来比较两者之间的差异并不合理。

对于老人的这种优势,密歇根大学的Jacqui Smith给了一个简洁的定义:Wisdom,即智慧。

这让我想起一年前的一场讨论。Wei说,在美国,Smart的学生都去当律师了;Tim说,是的,不过很多wise的人都留下来当教授了。就像古董的D&D游戏里人物都有Intellegence和Wisdom两项属性,智力是一回事,智慧又是一回事。而且随着年龄的增长,似乎两者之间又有可能发生转化。

大学里曾有一段时间让我感到十分沮丧,因为真切地感到自己的记忆力在减退,中学时代博闻强记的本事一去不返。而后才渐渐发觉逻辑能力在偷偷地取而代之。如今又是几年过去,记忆力和注意力更是未老先衰之态,但愿不要阿尔茨海默就好。不过幸好理解力倒是继续日复一日精进。此消彼长,有得有失,倒也公道。

早年有人想用“智商”把人分成三六九等,教育上搞出些尖子班少年班之类,最终不过拔出些仲永。后来又开始鼓吹“情商”,这概念本身倒是有些意义的,可惜还是难逃实用主义的改造。随之而来的素质教育风潮更把这种实用主义进一步推向了极致,好像琴棋书画就等同于高素质。于是折腾来折腾去,没见到国人的整体智慧水平有怎样的提高,倒是发现随口骂娘的孩子越来越多了。其实“智商”也好,“情商”也罢,总之智慧不是上一个辅导培训班就能从土里拔出来的。

读了差不多二十年的书,才渐渐悟到,最高的智慧原是道德。道德崇高之人才是真正有大智慧者。而道德是修炼出来的,人人皆可得之,但又非有决心与爱心者不可得。

5/24/2008

台湾民主的成长

连日来忙于准备论文,仿佛这世界除了写字台就是四川灾区。今天偷闲在飞之鸿那里看到马英九的就职演讲文稿,才恍然想起5.20已过。

早些时候我并不看好马英九的当选,因为看到他应对敌手人身攻击时木讷反应,担心他不能适应台湾政治的恶斗。现在来看,我并没有看错马英九,但是却低估了台湾民众的政治觉悟。从五年前的“枪击门”到红衫军的静坐斗争再到民进党的惨败,马英九说“跟很多年轻的民主国家相比,我们民主成长的阵痛期并不算长”,确实如此。民众不再被拙劣的竞选把戏所戏弄,台湾人觉悟得很快,台湾的民主成长得很快。

每提起“民主”这个敏感字眼,身边总有进步人士感慨道:“中国不适合民主制度。”紧接着,台湾总是被拿来当作那个可怜的反面典型。然而他们却未能看到台湾民主的成长。我们不能因为看到一个学步的孩子摔倒就断言人类不适合两足行走,否则我们现在一定还坐在树上捉虱子。

在马英九的演讲稿中,我看到了一个由民众所领导的政府,而不是被伟大光荣正确的政党所领导的民众。所以我有理由对台湾民主的未来保持乐观的期待,对中国民主的未来保持乐观的期待。

5/16/2008

志愿者请慎行

蜀中一震,华夏皆惊。五洲之内纷纷动员,捐款捐物、献血献策之外,更有远方热血青年跃跃欲试,召集志愿者欲赴前线,心情与勇气大为可嘉,然行动还需三思。

一来震区缺粮少水,疫情随时可能爆发,且道路艰险,只恐都市贵族援助不成反成累赘。

二来前方所缺乃特种技术人员,搜救、医疗、工程技师方有用武之地。时间紧任务重,非热情二字所能化解。

故若无周密计划或一技之长,且在家中安坐以确保脆弱的运输线畅通,也算是功劳一件。如有爱心,不如待险情平定之后投之于灾后重建。

5/15/2008

救灾拒绝借口

一下飞机,第一件事情就是打听救灾捐款的便捷渠道。救人如救火,想想如果是自己被压在瓦砾之下的感觉,还有什么可犹豫呢?

然而不论到了怎样的危急时刻,“理性”者终归还是很理性的,并且总还要站出来显示自己的理性。冷静是不错的,但冷静从来不是熄灭热情的借口。地方政府可能是腐败的,建筑可能是豆腐渣的,采血站可能是黑心的,NGO可能是靠不住的,CCTV可能是掩人耳目的……但现在不是讨论这些问题的时候,此刻,只有人的生命是最宝贵的。如果我的捐助中能够有一分钱被用来挽救人的生命,那么全部的付出就是值得的。如温家宝总理所言:“只要有一分的希望,我们就要付出百倍的努力。”

这个世界从来就不是完美的,我们并不能因其丑陋而放弃生活的希望。因噎废食并不值得炫耀,而是莫大的愚蠢。

祈祷,为我的朋友们

在昆明开会,突然接到北京的朋友打来的电话,才得知汶川的消息……

动身离开北京的前夜,刚刚与刘伟和茂宁畅谈今夏在卧龙的工作计划。不想此刻,我只能默默祈祷他们的平安。山坡上那一座座片石垒砌的农舍,堂屋里一张张淳朴热情的笑脸,我们还能再见吗?

都江堰-映秀的道路尚未打通,偏远村镇的救援更是遥遥无期。不停地拨打一个个电话,依旧是杳无音信的回音……

72小时就这样悄悄流过,我只有为你们祈祷,一遍又一遍。

5/09/2008

The Genial Gene

Fedex送来未来老板的尚未正式出版的新书稿:

The Genial Gene: Deconstructing Darwinian Selfishness

显然,从书名就可以判断这是针对Dawkins的The Selfish Gene而来的。内容上其实可以算是Evolution's Rainbow的专业加强版。

正好在去昆明的38小时火车上打发时间。

5/07/2008

加油,东东

今天一早,俺老爹从家里打电话通知我看电视,原来你正在冲顶珠峰。

我要亲眼目送同住四年的兄弟实现梦想。

加油,东东!